Skip to content

CSTACKEX-379: Resolving comments received on Primary storage pool resize upstream PR - #136

Open
sandeeplocharla wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
bugfix/CSTACKEX-379
Open

sandeeplocharla wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
bugfix/CSTACKEX-379

Conversation

@sandeeplocharla

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Description

This PR resolves the comments received on apache#14523

  1. The update storage pool now reuses the existing constants for flexVols.

Types of changes

  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • Enhancement (improves an existing feature and functionality)
  • Cleanup (Code refactoring and cleanup, that may add test cases)
  • Build/CI
  • Test (unit or integration test code)

Feature/Enhancement Scale or Bug Severity

Feature/Enhancement Scale

  • Major
  • Minor

Bug Severity

  • BLOCKER
  • Critical
  • Major
  • Minor
  • Trivial

Screenshots (if appropriate):

How Has This Been Tested?

How did you try to break this feature and the system with this change?

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🔴 Test Coverage Grade: D — Marginal

Metric Value
Line coverage 25.83%
Branch coverage 20.12%

Grade Scale

Grade Line Coverage Meaning
🟢 A ≥ 80% Excellent - this code sleeps well at night 😴
🟡 B 60-79% Good - almost there, don't stop now 😉
🟠 C 40-59% Acceptable - your code is wearing a seatbelt, but no airbags 😬
🔴 D 20-39% Marginal - boldly shipping where no test has gone before 🖖
⛔ F < 20% Failing - tests? what tests? 🔥

Branch coverage is shown as a secondary signal. Grade is determined by line coverage.
View full Actions run

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant